In an excellent opening transfer for any profession, Redditor burnerman1818 went on the barexam subreddit to share some private information. On the plus facet, he (and we’re simply assuming based mostly on the burnerMAN deal with) handed the Illinois bar examination.
But additionally, he completely cheated on it.
At this level, burnerman1818 did what any accountable individual confronted with a disaster of conscience would do: he went to Reddit (complete thread right here).
(h/t to Twitter’s @deadastin_e who flagged this publish — and additionally has a request if people on the market might help.)
I’m very a lot on document that the bar examination shouldn’t be a closed guide take a look at. Applicants who efficiently acknowledge the query being requested, hunt down and discover (in the true world… not some synthetic packet of curated take a look at supplies) the appropriate assets to deal with the problem, after which successfully talk the reply higher reveal “minimum competency” to be a lawyer than somebody who memorized a handbook.
I’m additionally very a lot on document that till these reforms are made, you shouldn’t be dishonest.
And if the preliminary confession wasn’t sufficient, notice that query 2 contemplates that — as soon as sworn in as an lawyer — this man intends to commit an ongoing moral breach by not reporting it. Are we positive he didn’t cheat on the MPRE too?
Responses weren’t all that supportive:
In burnerman1818’s protection, his lodging most likely are official. While he appears to blow them off as a part of his dishonest operation, the psychologist concerned is, presumably, an expert and never simply duped. And, frankly, burnerman1818’s habits carries a few of the markers of ADHD. So it’s not essentially truthful that he didn’t want lodging, he simply wanted to not use his lodging to cheat.
And, for the document, the overwhelming majority folks getting lodging will not be utilizing them to cheat and tales like this are simply going to set off bar examiners to make baseless overreactions and deny lodging due to a .0000001% likelihood somebody like this exists.
Oh ffs. I’m actively questioning how he failed the bar examination twice earlier than? If he already had a well-developed sample of dishonest via college did he simply determine to go legit for the bar examination? Because that is beginning to learn like a foul heist film with burnerman1818 making an attempt to surrender the dishonest life, however realizing he couldn’t make it on the surface so he went again in for one final rating.
While the response above prompt there could also be no method to catch this man, it truly appears fairly simple. Accommodations aren’t that widespread, so simply match UIC Marshall grads who failed twice, handed the third time with lodging, and who additionally claimed lodging in legislation college. It’s onerous to think about that’s a search results of a couple of or two.
That’s why one other Redditor has some suspicions:
A false flag operation! Now the plot thickens. But what could be the motive?
Could — for lack of a greater identify — the ex-burnerfriend be a newly minted lawyer getting not so anonymously maligned? If the play is to get the ex in hassle it appears much more silly to make use of a deal with that ends in “man.” It would make it fairly simple to determine what’s happening.
So, is that this extremely silly or a bumbling revenge try? Such a troublesome query!
And me with no flashcards to assist reply it.
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to e mail any ideas, questions, or feedback. Follow him on Twitter when you’re eager about legislation, politics, and a wholesome dose of school sports activities information. Joe additionally serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.